The red meat industry has undergone significant change during recent decades.
Mechanization has resulted in high-efficiency, high-volume cattle slaughter-dressing facilities.
Future trends will include consumer marketplace expression of a preference for reduced fat, which will be reflected in further grade standard changes.
Cultural trends affect the industries that supply them and they change to meet certain changing demands.
The passage of the federal Humane Slaughter Act became effective on July 1st 1961.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/13/slaughtering-animals-cut-meat-consumption-vegetarian
We must stop this cavalier slaughtering of animals
perhaps we shouldn’t be wiping them out in such a cavalier way, or eating so many of them. This is, apparently, the Age of Extinction. We are dominating the ecosystems and making a terminal mess of them; vertebrates have declined by over 50%, bees, hoverflies, ladybirds and earthworms aren’t doing too well, and without them, we are done for.
Animal Behaivour
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/04/animal-behaviour-laurel-braitman
I asked him how similar my anxiety might be to Oliver’s. (Her dog) “The underlying brain structures that are involved in these responses are really not that different at all,” Weinstein said. He went on to explain that the basic neurological hardware for emotional states exists across animal species, and with these similarities comes the possibility of malfunction.
Most animals cannot narrate their emotional experiences for humans, and even if they could (signing apes, say, or talking parrots), this isn’t necessarily the best measure of what they’re experiencing. The complex process of making sense of our racing heartbeat, sweaty palms and surges of good or bad feelings is what underpins much of psychotherapy; we simply don’t always know what we’re feeling while we’re feeling it.
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/aug/29/slaughterhouse-crossing-line-between-life-meat
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/jul/21/giving-up-beef-reduce-carbon-footprint-more-than-cars
Giving up beef will reduce reduce carbon footprint more than cars, says expert.
The heavy impact on the environment of meat production was known but the research shows a new scale and scope of damage, particularly for beef.
- Beef requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken.
- 11 times more water
- Production results in five times more climate-warming emissions.
- When compared to staples like potatoes, wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme, requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse gases.
Agriculture is a significant driver of global warming and causes 15% of all emissions, half of which are from livestock.
The huge amounts of grain and water needed to raise cattle is a concern to experts worried about feeding an extra 2 billion people by 2050.
Beef had a far greater impact than all the others because as ruminants, cattle make far less efficient use of their feed.
“The biggest intervention people could make towards reducing their carbon footprints would not be to abandon cars, but to eat significantly less red meat,”
http://science.time.com/2013/12/16/the-triple-whopper-environmental-impact-of-global-meat-production/
Livestock production — which includes meat, milk and eggs — contributes 40% of global agricultural gross domestic product, provides income for more than 1.3 billion people and uses one-third of the world’s fresh water.
- Each year, livestock sector produces 586 million tons of milk, 124 million tons of poultry, 91 million tons of pork, 59 million tons of cattle meat and 11 tons of sheep and goat meat.
- 1.3 billion tons of grain are consumed by farm animals each year.
- The highest total of livestock-related greenhouse-gas emissions comes from the developing world, which accounts for 75% of the global emissions from cattle and other ruminants and 56% of the global emissions from poultry and pigs.